<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Digijustin - Latest Comments in Is Twitter the Digg Killer?</title><link>http://digijustin.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://digijustin.disqus.com/is_twitter_the_digg_killer/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:14:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is Twitter the Digg Killer?</title><link>http://digijustin.com/2009/02/11/is-twitter-the-digg-killer/#comment-6504297</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The only thing that I have against using Twitter for the same thing I used to use Digg for is that my stream moves a lot faster in Twitter and I do miss a lot.  I use Tweetdeck to group a lot but some stuff still gets missed.  But Digg is one of those sites that just a year ago I couldn't imagine life without and now I never check it.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">digijustin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:14:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter the Digg Killer?</title><link>http://digijustin.com/2009/02/11/is-twitter-the-digg-killer/#comment-6195031</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I never thought about it that way, but I completely agree. Twitter, because you follow who you want, is also a MUCH better filter than Digg. Masses of people, especially on the internet, are extremely stupid. Digg also has a higher rate of retard internet dweebs, while Twitter requires that you be able to carry on something of a convo.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So...yes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tdhurst</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:30:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>